- The option of merging back Visa Inc and Visa Europe has always been on the table, and it has long been the question of “when”, not “if”.
- Visa Europe’s separate processing infrastructure and various regulatory concerns are among a number of factors that would make a quick deal unlikely. A number of options could be considered for ownership of various assets of Visa Europe, and careful negotiations would likely take place before any deal is struck.
- The article seemed to imply that the banks would use the funds to set up a rival system in Europe. I would argue that it would be an extremely difficult and probably unnecessary thing for them to do. Even if the deal were to happen, Visa payments system will continue to be available for banks in Europe, just like MasterCard has been, even though it opted for a global model since the IPO. Also, there have been multiple attempts to create a “3rd card scheme” in Europe, but none of them have succeeded so far and, as I suggested in my report on the topic last year, it’s time to move on. In my view, given the current economic climate and the latest developments in payments, the European banks would have better uses for the proceeds of sale than to try and set-up an alternative cards network.
- Each ownership structure has its own advantages, but one of the effects of the IPOs on Visa and MasterCard has been their increased ability to buy other companies and strike partnership deals improving their competitiveness.
- While the integration of the two companies would naturally cause a degree of disruption, a unified Visa would arguably be better placed to compete and innovate on a global scale.
March 21, 2013 by Leave a Comment
Changes Ahead at Visa?
When Visa restructured in 2007-2008, Visa USA, Visa Canada, and Visa International were merged into the new public company. Visa Europe became a separate company owned by its member banks. An article in Wall Street Journal this week claimed that the European banks were ready to sell their stake in Visa Europe back to Visa Inc. I am not in the position to comment on the validity of that claim, but our clients have been asking for our views, so I wanted to post a few observations: